Category Archives: Movie Review

Science Fiction Noir

St. Charles Public Library IL - Blade Runner - Harrison FordOne of the glories of science fiction is that as well as taking us to far-flung worlds and to other galaxies, it can take us to worlds of our imagination. Some of these imaginary worlds are dark and dystopian, and a genre called “science fiction noir” has emerged over the years. You may be familiar with the term “film noir,” which refers to atmospheric crime melodramas usually shot in black and white, with menacing shadows and smoky rooms. The hero is often as disaffected as the villain, and wanders lost through the urban labyrinth.  The amoeba-like genre that is science fiction has easily appropriated this dark vision, and has come up with its own twists to film noir, though perhaps the power of  “sci fi noir” lies not in its fantasy scenerios, but from the alienation of modern society that it plugs into. You’re not a replicant? Really? Are you sure?

St. Charles Public Library IL - Dark CityTwo of the all-time great sci-fi noir films are Blade Runner (1982) and Dark City (1998). Some would say that Blade Runner is one of the greatest sci fi movies, ever.  In the dark and ever-raining  world of Los Angeles in 2019, expert Blade Runner Rick Deckard reluctantly agrees to hunt down a group of recently escaped replicants. Blade Runner was based on writer Philip K. Dick’s novel Do Android’s Dream of Electric Sheep? Eight other sci fi noir-type movies are based on Dick’s fiction, of which Dick wrote, “In my writing I even question the universe; I wonder out loud if it is real, and I wonder out loud if all of us are real.” This is the uneasy premise that much of sci-fi noir is based upon.

Dark City is set in a 1940-ish city where the sun never shines. A man wakes up to find himself accused of a string of murders, and soon he is on the run from both the police, and some mysterious people called the“Strangers.”

Some other films that are characterized as being sci-fi noir include Twelve Monkeys, co-authored by David Peoples (who wrote Blade Runner), Minority Report, and Alphaville. Alphaville, which was shot on the night-time streets of Paris, is about a secret agent who must destroy Alphaville and its dictatorial computer, Alpha 60. The 1927 classic Metropolis is also sometimes typified as being sci-fi noir.

Here’s a challenge: What movie isn’t mentioned above, but should be? Make your case!

Jeff, Who Lives at Home

St. Charles Public Library IL - Jeff, Who Lives at Home DVDJeff, Who Lives at Home is a very flawed film. If one looks too closely at the seams, it will unravel in the blink of an eye. It’s also my favorite film of 2012 so far. This might seem like an insult to this year in film, but with new films from Wes Anderson, PIXAR, Joss Whedon and Ridley Scott, it is anything but. The innate problem with Jeff, Who Lives at Home is rooted in everyone’s own beliefs. It’s a film about fate and destiny, and therefore blurs the line between contrivances and plot mechanics. You’ll either think the film is offensively implausible and totally pretentious, or you’ll think it’s surprisingly sweet and that the “contrivances” are the point of the film. Either way, it’s worth a shot.

The film follows Jeff during the course of one day as he tries to run one simple errand but gets needlessly distracted by “signs from the universe.” Jeff is a very kind man, and he believes that everything happens for a reason and that the only way to uncover your destiny is to follow the signs the universe lays out for you. He’s also 30-something years old, living in his mother’s basement and has quite a recreational drug habit. His older brother Pat is the antithesis of Jeff. He is materialistic, self-absorbed and very cynical. However Pat also does have a job, a wife and a home of his own. Needless to say, they don’t get along very well.

This is a film that sneaks up on you. It seems aimless and meandering, but the whole time it is building towards something. Whether you call that fate or coincidence, is up to you. It’s one of the most uplifting films I’ve seen in a long time.  The opening scene is an important one, as it lays out exactly how the film will unfold, but that’s easy to miss on your first viewing. Jeff, Who Lives at Home has a little bit of everything, so I highly recommend it. As long as you check your reservations at the door.

View the theatrical trailer below and find the DVD in our collection!

W.E.

W.E. is a splendid film that is part biopic and part soap opera.  The tandem story lines revolve around the true drama of Edward VIII of England and his scandalous affair with twice divorced American, Wallis Simpson, and the fictional account of Wally Winthrop (named after Mrs. Simpson) a well-to-do socialite trapped in a loveless and abusive marriage.  The two themes merge as Wally, who is obsessed with all things pertaining to the Duke and Duchess, is drawn to an auction at Sotheby’s where the sumptuous artifacts of the Windsor estate are on display.  She fingers the elegantly monogrammed linens, eyes the sparkling dinnerware and admires the dazzling jewelry. She is so taken with their love story, and consequently with anything that belonged to them, because she desperately seeks to know what it must be like to be loved so passionately. Because she is so lonely and vulnerable it’s no surprise that Wally (Abbie Cornish) opens herself to the flirtations of a Sotheby’s security guard.  We can all guess where that is going.

But the tale of Wally and her paramour (Oscar Isaac) pales in comparison to the compelling romance of Edward and Wallis.  It is said Edward was not only dominated by Wallis, but was possessed by her.  So enthralled was he with Mrs. Simpson that he renounced the throne, and all that went with it,  in favor of “the woman I love.”

W. E. gives us a sweeping view of the privileged lives of Wallis and Edward.  The costumes, the sets, the venues of England in the 1930s, and the attention to detail are so delicious that we’re embraced by a lifestyle that is at once stylish and chic. It’s a world where no hair is ever out of place, and one wouldn’t think of reaching for the inappropriate utensil at a dinner party.  Wallis (Andrea Riseborough)  is luminous in her pale skin and rouged lips, set off by her dark tresses.  But we see her as the French might see her, as a jolie laide*, because it is her charisma, and not her beauty that captures the heart of the would-be king.

History views the affair with a jaundiced eye, since Edward lost everything by abdicating the throne, and making the unpopular choice to marry a foreigner. In a rare turnabout this film raises the question of what Wallis was denied because of her choice to accept his proposal. In a letter, she tells us that she lost her privacy, her reputation and her esteem because she was so reviled once she became the Duchess.

If you were a fan of The King’s Speech, the Weinstein brothers are hoping you’ll also be captivated by W. (Wallis) E. (Edward).  This film has a similar ambiance, a must for historical romance enthusiasts and those who are enamored with the royal family.

Catch a glimpse at the film’s trailer below and see if we have a copy of the film available.

*A woman who is attractive though not conventionally pretty.

Note: This film was co-written and directed by Madonna.

 

Hanna

HannaThe film Hanna is a typical coming of age story. When it opens in a tundra setting, the protagonist Hanna is doing what all 16 year old girls like to do on the weekend: hunting a wild reindeer. After she has successfully killed her target, a man sneaks up on her and the two engage in a brief but tense fight. It’s apparent that neither are fighting to hurt the other, and it turns out the man is her father, and that this is just another Saturday morning for the two. It is revealed that Hanna and her father have been living on their own, completely disconnected from civilization as we know it and her father has brought her up to be a deadly assassin and a walking encyclopedia. She may not have a driver’s license like most girls want at her age, but she can snap your neck in less than three seconds flat.

Hanna is a breath of fresh air into the stale genre that is suspense thriller. During the very few and surprisingly brief action scenes, the camera rarely cuts away (a cheap trick that way too many action blockbusters are guilty of these days). What’s particularly engaging about this thriller is that director Joe Wright is more interested in the development of Hanna’s character than he is in staging those elaborate action sequences, and it makes for a very rewarding hybrid of traditional coming of age story and international espionage thriller, all filtered through a fairy tale lens. It’s a testament to Joe Wright’s talent that the film comes off as anything but a mess, despite all this mixing and matching.

Saoirse Ronan (I don’t know how to pronounce it either) gives a very nuanced performance in Hanna, as a teenage girl by loyalty to her father and the desire to grow up independently from him. The film is at its best when it follows Hanna’s travels with a lovable family of tourists and explores how far removed she really is from society. Hanna is a grade A anti-thriller that excels when it’s pulling its punches instead of throwing them.

View the theatrical trailer below and find the DVD in our collection!

The Way

It’s impossible to view this film without drawing parallels between Geoffrey Chaucer’s Canterbury Tales and Emilio Estevez’ The Way.  Both unfold as a journey to a holy shrine undertaken by diverse pilgrims who come to reveal themselves to each other, and to themselves, as they are tested by the rigors of the landscape and the physical hardships of the odyssey.

Martin Sheen embraces the role of Tom, who travels to France to collect the remains of his son Dan (played by Emilio Estevez, his son in real life) who has died accidentally during his pilgrimage on the 800KM Camino de Santiago.  Tom is a staid ophthalmologist who has lived a conservative lifestyle, while Dan has sought his interpretation of a more meaningful existence by testing  boundaries and pushing the envelope.  Neither fully accepts or understands the raison d’etre of the other in a classic father/son standoff.

In an effort to assuage his grief and grasp the motivation  behind Dan’s pilgrimage, Tom determines to trace the journey in his son’s footsteps,  leaving some of Dan’s ashes at various way stations along the Camino as a way of honoring his memory and accomplishing for Dan what he is physically unable to complete for himself.

But, this being a pilgrimage, no one’s journey is a solitary one, so Tom is reluctantly thrown into the mix with follow travelers. There is Joost, the jovial Dutchman, who is seeking to regain his wife’s affection, Sarah, a prickly Canadian, who is trying to quit smoking and recover from an abusive marriage, and Jack, a hard-drinking Irishman with writer’s block, whose next big novel will be a thinly disguised rehash of the lives of his fellow pilgrims.  There are as many reasons for making the pilgrimage as there are pilgrims on the Camino de Santiago.

Along the way, we are in turn amused by the interactions among four such diverse seekers, and moved by poignant self-revelations. This is all played out against the scenic backdrop of the breathtaking Pyrennes and the Basque country, mingled with the quaintness of small villages.  Here, affable innkeepers gather the sojourners offering respite and relaxation before the journey begins anew the next day.  Food and drink are plentiful, but accommodations are sparse and crowded, further breaking down the physical and emotional barriers that separate the seekers.

Glimpses of Dan in the faces of his fellow travelers reassure Tom that father and son are moving towards a reconciliation, and that the journey has become as much a spiritual trek as it has been a physical one.  Dan reminds his father, “You don’t choose a life, you live  it.”  We sense that Tom has awakened a capacity for allowing, as much as he has clung to his rigid philosophy of choice.

View the official movie trailer for The Way and our catalog to check-out a copy today.

 

 

 

Carnage

Carnage

“Morally you’re supposed to overcome your impulses, but there are times you don’t want to overcome them.” So says one of the characters in Roman Polanski’s newest film: Carnage. It’s a sentiment that only brings itself to light gradually throughout the film, until finally the characters are devoid of any moral sensibilities which is humorously amplified in this intensely claustrophobic film. The film is very condensed (both in running time and setting), since it takes place entirely in a cramped New York apartment and is told in real-time (meaning the film never jumps in time). The set-up is as follows: when two boys in grade school get into an altercation, the parents of the children get together to converse about the event in a civilized manner. Needless to say, nobody is acting civilized by the end of the film.

Carnage is a dark comedy for sure, seeing that all the laughs are at the expense of the characters’ discomfort and uncomfortable interplay, but the over-the-top performances (that are more akin to the stage than the screen) keep the film from veering into depressing territory. The film is funny because although the situation takes place in a state of heightened reality, it all comes from a place of truth. All parents have delusional perceptions of their children and it’s only natural for them to become irrational once somebody threatens those perceptions. The script doesn’t look down on these characters, it simply highlights the comedic absurdity of adults who believe they are above acting like children (which we’re all guilty of).


All four actors put in wonderful performances across the board as the two central couples: Penelope and Michael Longstreet (Jodie Foster and John C. Reilly), and Nancy and Alan Cowan (Kate Winslet and Cristoph Waltz). This film would be nothing without committed actors and thankfully all four are up to the task. John C. Reilly is terrific as Michael, a middle class door to door salesman who takes pride in his mediocrity and pessimism, and Jodie Foster’s Penelope is pitch-perfect as the passive-aggressive (later, just aggressive) wife that instigated the meeting. Kate Winslet and Cristoph Waltz (in another standout role since Inglorious Basterds) have a wonderful chemistry (or lackthereof) as an elitist couple that are really only there as a courtesy.

Making the most out of its tiny setting and small cast, Carnage is a wonderful little film that proves the power of writing and acting.

Attack the Block

Can a movie taking place in the grim council estates of South London, where aliens have landed and are viciously attacking hapless residents—can such a movie be called “light-hearted”? The answer is “yes” if the movie is Attack the Block, a sci-fi flick by Joe Cornish. Noting that the movie was one of the New York Times’ Don’t Miss Movies You Probably Missed, I sat down to watch and was soon alternately screaming and laughing—how fun is that?

The premise is that a gang headed by a brooding youth named Moses is faced with aliens who have invaded on Bonfire Night, an annual celebration in Britain with fireworks. In all the hubbub, the police don’t notice the meteor-like balls of fire that land in the projects, so the kids are faced with fighting the aliens themselves. Part of the humor of the situation is that the kids have grown up in such grim environment, and are so used to be harassed by cops and other gangs, that the aliens are just another bad-a… thing to deal with. Gathering clubs, knives, and guns, they go after the aliens, who have glow-in-the dark fangs. There are some sub-plots involving another gang, and some mellow drug dealers, but basically the film is a fast-paced, exciting fight between the kids and the aliens. There is an unexpected sweetness to this movie, as we see the kids transformed from a seemingly hardened street gang, to being revealed as vulnerable human beings who are discovering that they are capable of something better. And the aliens, who have been described as “gorilla-wolf things,” look more like Newfoundland dogs to me, albeit with glowing eyes and fangs—but not slimy or scary. So this isn’t “Alien” with its relentless alien horror, but rather has a “Ghostbusters” vibe.

One quibble: the speech of the gang members was sometimes really hard to understand—not only was it a South London accent, but it was gang lingo. But the story is straightforward enough to understand even if you miss a few lines.

 

 

 

Seen One Take Two

Is it possible that another film about Truman Capote, that appeared after
the Oscar winning Capote is worth seeing?  The answer is a resounding
Yes!

If you enjoyed the 2006 Oscar winning film Capote, you might want to consider complementing your experience by viewing Toby Jones’ portrayal of Capote in Infamous. Because the films were released just months apart, and Capote was
the first on the scene, it grabbed the lion’s share of box office receipts and garnered rave reviews due to Philip Seymour Hoffman’s clone-like performance Infamous was unjustly overlooked.

In Infamous Toby Jones camps Capote’s outrageous mannerisms, and outspoken commentaries which made him the darling of sophisticated  social circles, and everyone’s pet.  Cut to scenes of Truman, surrounded by captivated socialites and movie stars, as he quips one liners.  Infamous provides us with a view of the humorous side of Capote, a man who was never afraid to
be a larger than life caricature  of  himself, and lends a comedic air to an otherwise serious film.

In deciding to write his true crime blockbuster In Cold Blood, Capote was
drawn inextricably into the lives of the assailants.  The soulful relationship between writer and murderer, the  shared childhood abandonment, the need for each to make a lasting  impression, one as famous and the other as infamous,
is exquisitely probed and explored in Infamous.

Capote’s subsequent lapse into alcoholism and depression, exacerbated by  the fact that he never wrote another critically acclaimed book, is now understood in light of the devastation  he suffered in losing his soulmate to the hangman’s noose. Because of Toby Jones’ sensitive portrayal in  Infamous, it becomes apparent  that, because he exploited Perry’s confidences to underscore the realism of In Cold Blood,  and profited from his lover’s demise,   Capote was haunted for the rest of his life.

Infamous leads us to a greater understanding of the unique genius that was Truman Capote.

Infamous. [DVD videorecording]. Widescreen version. Burbank, CA: Warner Home Video, [2007].

Au Revoir les Enfants

au revoir.jpgI had always meant to watch Au revoir les enfants, by Louis Malle, but it seemed like one of those “art” movies that might be a bit pretentious or tedious. So
it was a revelation to watch it the other evening, as it is a great,
great movie, one that leaves you changed after you’ve seen it. It’s based on Malle’s memories of an event at a Catholic boys school where he was a student, in France in 1943. Three new students had been enrolled, and Malle’s alter ego, Julien, made friends with one of them, a boy named Jean. As it turns out, the school’s headmaster Pere Jacques de Jesus, was providing refuge for the three boys, who were Jewish. A disgruntled kitchen helper named Joseph, who is resentful of the boys at the school because they are well-to-do, informs on the three boys, and the Gestapo raids the school. By a mere glance, Julien unintentionally reveals that Jean is one of
the Jewish students. The three students and Pere de Jesus are taken away and killed in death camps. As Pere de Jesus leaves, he bids farewell to the students: “Goodbye, children. See you soon.”

No matter how much you know about the Holocaust, at a certain level it is still hard to fathom how it happened. This film shows you one of the mechanisms. French society was rife with anti-semitism. The particular Germans shown in this film are pretty decent; it’s the French who are the “heavies.” The resentment of the kitchen helper, who had been disciplined by Pere de Jesus for petty theft, was enough to turn him against the three boys and to take malicious pleasure in sending them to their terrible fate.

This is a memory told with crystalline clarity and beauty. It removes any distance we may feel from a long past historic event, and replaces it with palpable reality. Perhaps Louis Malle made it to atone for what had to be a terrible, shocking moment in his young life. In the movie, as the narrator, he
says “More than 40 years have passed, but I’ll remember every second of that
January morning until the day I die.”

In French, with subtitles.

The Station Agent

The Station Agent.jpegRalph Waldo Emerson once said: “The only way to have a
friend is to be one.” It’s a lesson that Fin, the protagonist of The Station Agent, has never taken the
time to learn. Fin is a train enthusiast that inherits a little shack of a
train depot and decides to retire early, not so that he can enjoy life, but so
he can seclude himself from it. He’s fairly smart, a diligent worker, and is
quite handsome, but nobody notices any of these qualities upon meeting Fin,
because all people tend to notice is that he’s a dwarf. Society can be very
cruel (but not particularly clever) when it comes to the way we treat people
who are different from us, and it is because of these mindless actions that Fin
has written off the rest of the world. Of course, what Fin doesn’t realize is
that the actions of strangers and friends are not synonymous with each other,
and everybody’s capable of making a friend. After all, it is harder to open
yourself up to a potential friend than it is to withstand a stranger’s hurtful
comments.

When Fin moves in to the train depot, he gets a little more
than he bargained for when he meets Joe, his overly-friendly neighbor who just
likes to talk. Along the way he also meets Olivia, played by the always
wonderful Patricia Clarkson, who is dealing with issues of her own. Through
Joe’s incessant but harmless nagging, the three of them form an unlikely
friendship despite Fin’s initial protests. It’s in the way that it
authentically captures human interactions that makes The Station Agent one of the best films about friendship ever made.

Director/writer Thomas McCarthy laces the script delicately
with very subtle human moments that makes the film feel so down to earth. None
of the characters are perfect, and they all make mistakes, but it is that sense
of realism that draws us in to the film. These are people that we ourselves
would want to spend time with, once we get to know them, and it makes for a
very pleasant viewing experience, even when unpleasant events occur. The Station Agent is truly like a good
friend: reliably sweet and will leave you with a smile after every visit.

- Nick